Author: Sydney Sheets

The outfits met gala this year were… interesting. Some of them were actually pretty nice but with some of these outfits I’m honestly not even sure what went wrong in these designer’s heads.

To start with Emma Chamberlain:

This dress looks likes it was bought off of Shein. The shoes are nice but the dress looks baggy and cheap, like it doesn’t fit. The skirt part is so boxy and it looks like they forgot to trim off the end of the fabric and realized there was excess fabric later and they just went with it. It looks pretty baggy and i don’t really like the mosaic gem pattern (not that bad but it reminds me of snake skin and I personally dont like it all thag much). It looks super uncomfortable. But this is definitely not the worst outfit there.

Kim Kadasian:

If you’ve seen anything from thos years met you’ve seen this dress. What is that? It looks like stupidity as a visual. Do you have a ninja conference later tonight? Why does the designer think this is okay? No one thinks this looks good at all.

I honestly dont know a lot of celebrates names so his name his Cereal Man:

Okay dude, you like cereal, do you really need an outfit to show that. You couldn’t just say that? Or maybe this was his rug and he realized he was out of clothes, pulled on his rug and got in the car. The material looks like a blanket.

There were some good dressesthough, Billie Ellishfor example:

This is considered the best dressed for the Met (that I know of):

Ok, I’ve seen her before but I can’t remember her name, I’m sorry.

However, I can see a light pink dress going really well with this over it. The way it flows is super elegant. I love the pattern and the jewels. I live the necklace. Her hair and her make up looks great. The style is great. I think it would be a dress you could see at a fancy dress store if it had some maybe silk or velvet or taferta light pink cloth under it.

It’s not the worst here. It’s just unpractical. I understand they want to be unique and shocking so I guess it does full fill that purpose.

Here’s the last one for now:

The dress would be pretty, a bit uncreative in form and style but still nice if it didn’t have the writing. The red and white and in thag font makes me think of Chick-fil-A (the absolute most delicious of all restaurants, don’t care about the politics around it, just as a general statement we can all agree Chick-fil-A is perfection). I like the fabric at the top, looks super comfy and I’m also a fan of the arm instead of shoulder strap, a bit simple but the style isn’t too bad actually. She also got a free $300,000 ticket to go to the Met and then wore that dress, come on, tell me you’re privlages without telling me your privileged. Is she the only one who can’t see the irony in receiving a $300,000 ticket to the Met where she wore a dress that said “tax the rich.”

The lady next to her looks really good, her dress is fancy and simple, nice color, nice cloth, looks good on her. I think if you cut the bottom and made it knee length it would be an improvement.

Bith dresses are fancy, seems like something you’d wear to a cocktail party. The look nice (besides the writing) but maybe not for the met gala. It’s a bit too simple, not unique or original enough for the Meta gala.

Some of these dresses were nice but a few of these were extremely stupid and hideous. Some of them are graceful, elegant, draw attention, and/or jaw dropping while others are a complete fail. Some of them are ridiculous, to simple, childish, and trashy.

I thought that everyone was in agreement that Superman sucked but apparently there are people who like Superman… so here are the reasons that superman sucks:

Superman is basically an invincible hero. He has super strength (including the ability to jump extremely high), x-ray vision, laser vision, the ability to fly, super speed, durability (meaning he can’t really be hurt or feel pain), and super senses. It’s basically impossible to kill or beat him without kryptonite. He’s even as fast if not faster or almost as fast as the Flash whose main power is being fast, bruh, that’s a bit annoying. He’s that op (overpowered). Shouldn’t it be repetitive then that he either wins with no struggle whatsoever or he gets weaker because of kryptonite and wins anyway?

Okay, yeah, he does die in “Superman vs Batman” but I’m convinced that they only let him die because they want to prove he wasn’t invincible. And how many other times has he lost? Never, that’s the only time he loses. He also only loses because he’s been exposed to a ton of kryptonite and he just fought the Batman (who still got his ass kicked even while Superman was weak) and then he was exploded? They didn’t really explain what that was, maybe it was some weird blast thing, I’m not sure. I’m sure they only killed him to prove he was invincible and because they need someone who was strong enough to withstand a blast like that. Not to mention he’s also stabbed all the way through his body, my guy should have just died from being stabbed like that. How did he still have the strength to get closer, making the stabby thingy go further into his body and still have the power to push the spear into that creature (not to mention the spear was made of kryptonite which should have made him even weaker by being so close to it). How did he withstand all of that? He withstood so much before he finally died.

Let’s refer to “Justice League” he literally moves a whole building, it’s annoying. The bug creatures didn’t even stand a chance he defeated. He defeated Steppenwolf in like 2 seconds when everyone else was trying so hard to defeat him Superman just threw him across the room so easily. Also, that first line where he goes “I’m a fan of truth, I’m also a big fan of Justice too” just made me cringe it was so cheesy. Then after he rips that building out of the ground and carries it to safety he then goes back and knocks Steppenwolf down again. And sure he gets knocked down by the blast and feels the pain of the blast but we know he’s going to get back up pretty quick anyway, he’s just as pain intolerant as a cyborg.

He also always looks so smug all the time, which makes me want to roll my eyes.

He also goes through no moral or relatable struggle. He had a perfect partner, perfect parents, the perfect job, the list goes on. His life is perfect. He goes through no improvement, he learns no lesson, he has no overarching story. There’s no struggle. There’s no point if he never struggles, if everything so easy for him the story is just boring. You know he’s going to win the battle and you feel no fulfillment from watching the movie (or reading the comic books) because he doesn’t go through any improvement because he’s already perfect.

Let’s compare him to Wonder Woman, someone who’s also pretty powerful. (I choose Wonder Woman instead of Batman because I feel like Batman and Superman are polar opposites and I think it’s better to compare him to someone who is similar but without all the annoying parts to better point out what his flaws are.) She doesn’t actually have any superpowers (at least in the movies apparently it’s different in the comic books but I haven’t read the comic books) she’s just powerful. She has super speed and super strength but she earned that. She is built a bit different than most humans, they are a lot stronger and faster than any human, take the bullet seen, for example, no human could ever be that fast but she did work hard to be even stronger and even faster. The Amazons are much stronger than normal people but they’re also shown to work hard to be even stronger than they already are. She’s also an amazing warrior and she trained to be an amazing warrior (we know she trains and works toward physical improvement from Wonder Woman WWI (not 1984)). She has powerful armor and powerful weapons (along with the also of truth) but if a normal person had those things they would also be an amazing warrior so she’s not op she just has an aid to help her fight. One of the main things I find honorable about her is her bravery. She leads the American team into battle in her first movie, she’s the strongest of the bunch but she could have been taken down just like the rest of the soldiers the heroic thing about this scene is her bravery. Superman, however, does not work hard to be powerful and strong, he’s born with all of his powers he doesn’t earn them nor are his powers just an aid like Wonder Woman’s armor or her weapons. The only time where I think she’s op is when a ton of boulders fall on her in “Justice League” but I’ll let it slide because it was one time. She also goes through a moral and human struggle. She has to deal with the grief of losing her first love and having to regain hope. She actually struggles and has to work through the struggle. For a long time, she shuts down and goes into mourning over his death but then she pushes through the struggle for the greater good.

Superman never went through and moral or physical struggle nor did he have to go through moral or physical improvement or work hard to achieve his good fortune. He’s a pointless hero and I don’t understand why people like him.

Hello! This website will mostly be used for cat posts but I have a couple of other things too. I have loved cats since 1st or 2nd grade and have loved them since. A lot of people think they are selfish and don’t really care about people but they do. I hope everyone on this website will love cats too. I have 2 cats and many friends with cats (I don’t have one friend who hates cat, I’m lucky). If you have any questions on my website or on cats ask them in the comments so I can answer them. Also, feel free to leave things you don’t like in my website tips and things you like about my website or things I can help you understand you can leave in the comments too. I would love to hear your opinion.

Most of this website will be around cats, but there will also be other things too. I would also like to say I love dogs, but I surround my self more with cats. I have met many people who love cats threw out my life and would like to talk about that some. I know people whom you would never guess loved cats unless they told you. I know someone who is normally very shy and doesn’t talk much, but one day I wore my cat shirt, (I’m so weird, it’s my favorite shirt but it might also be my weirdest,) he saw my shirt and couldn’t stop talking about cats. I never knew or would have guessed his cat passion until then. It was nice to know that you can never guess what people have a passion for without talking to them.

Although I love cats, I know many people are more prone to like dogs, but I’d like to sway your opinion if you are anti-cat or just don’t like them in one of my posts called “Why cats aren’t that bad.” Keep loving the animal you want and don’t let them change your opinion based on more people liking the other animal and don’t hit donkeys.

Both dog and cats are stellar animals, but I believe most people like dogs and not cats -my dad likes dogs better because there’s more of them to eat you may like dogs for the same reason (I’m joking don’t take that the wrong way, I hope P.E.T.A isn’t reading this). I think lots of people think cats are heartless and don’t care at all, but that’s, for the most part, not true. Like humans all cats have different personalities, some are rambunctious and others are calm and quiet, but all are adorable heart-melting creatures. Dogs… are probably more loyal though… but harder to sit down and cuddle with. Cuddling a cat always helps me with stress and melts my worries away. Cats are also definitely smarter, they usually don’t have to be taught, they just know. My cat has figured out how to open doors without being taught, she learned it on her own, usually dogs have to be trained, even though it feels great to give your snuggly cute doggie a treat it’s easier not too. Which brings me to the next point, cats are so much easier to care for, they don’t need as much attention. But I mostly wanted to point out they are not nasty or cruel like they are categorized as, and both dogs and cats have pros and cons, I just wanted to go threw some cat pros. Also, cat’s make better memes, dogs are adorable tough.

1. Lizard’s tales still move when they come off.
2. Hippotamus milk is pink.
3. Barcode scanners scan the white and not the black.
4. Teeth and strawberries can melt (I left strawberries in my lunch box for a week and it became liquid and when I touched the one strawberry that wasn’t melted it exploded– don’t worry it was still in the bag. If you don’t believe that teeth can melt I know this because my dentist told us that my back teeth might have melted when I was young and caught a cold that made my inner body temperature so hot that my teeth melted.)
5. Carrots don’t actually help you see in the dark, that was a lie made up by the Germans during WWI (I think, maybe WWII) to trick the enemy team because they were wondering how the Germans knew where all their ships were so they said they spread the rumor that carrots make your eyes better. The real reason they knew where the ships were was because they had radar, not because of carrots.
6. I don’t really care that people use these words interchangeably but pots and pans are different, pots are box-shaped, and used to make noodles and rice and pans are flat and used to grill vegetables, pancakes, eggs, and meat (for Chinese food and stuff).
7. The spiral things in front of barbershops are red, blue, and white because barbers were the people who cut sick patience when people were dumb and thought people were sick because they had bad blood so they cut their wrist because they thought they would get better that way. The red represents blood and the white represents bandages, it’s basically a reference to history. I don’t know what the blue represents.
8. Your teeth can melt if you catch a cold at a really young age.
9. If you drink too much water at a time it can make your cells explode.
10. Hippopotomonstrosesphobia is the name for the phobia of long words. Hahaha
11. In most movies, they put an egg carton, baguettes, and some green leafy thing in a brown paper bag whenever a character brings in groceries (side note: who puts groceries in brown paper bags? That’s so impractical).
12. Pizza is not actually an Italian food it was invented in America (I think it was also invented by an American).
13. Atoms won’t change under observation.
14. Grasshoppers spray a brown liquid to blind an attacking predator.
15. Alexander Grandbell purposed answering the phone with “Ahoy!” when it was first invented.

The first dumb thing on this list is Stories on Cooking Websites. If you never go onto cooking websites then let me explain what I mean, the majority of cooking websites have long stories behind the recipe. 1st) no offense (even though this will be super offensive, sorry, but keep in mind this is my blog so I’m just going to share my honest opinion) nobody cares about the story we just want the recipe–sorry– if you want to tell a story start a blog or write a story. Why do people keep writing their whole life story? Do they think people read those? Is writing a story requires to make a recipe? If you read those please tell me but I seriously doubt there is a single person on earth reads them. 2nd) I love recipe sites where they either let you skip to the recipe or even better don’t have the story. Food Network doesn’t have life stories along with their recipes, which my favorite part of the website so thank you :).

In my introduction, I mentioned this post and I made several points if that didn’t change your opinion at least just a little that maybe this will.

Most cats are known for being mean and distant and not as loyal as dogs (that last one is true) but dogs can be that way too. Have you ever seen a cat and freaked out because you thought it was going to attack you? Probably not but have you ever heard a dog bark and jumped? Probably, just like there are bad cats there are bad dogs, and bad people, and so on.

I know this doesn’t help my point but I think it’s pretty funny. I was staying at my friend’s house and she was talking to her family about one of their nabors. I had seen his guy around their street and was pretty sure who she was talking about. He was one of those people who thinks he’s cool but he’s just annoying and kind of bratty, I don’t really know him but anyone who wears sunglasses and pants so low that your shorts are touching your ankles and you buy shirts too big for you you are automatically considering a mouth breathing nark in my book. You may be thinking “don’t judge people by their appearance” all I can say is he chose to look like that, if you choose to look like a moron then I can judge you and you can judge me for wearing my space cat shirt, I chose to wear that, so judge away. You might say I don’t know his situation but I think that he could buy some clothes that don’t make him look like a jerk because he lived in those naborhoods that you go to to get the king-sized bars on Halloween. Anyway, I could tell this kid was just an idiotic jerk and I was right because my friend was walking about how he threw rocks at their cats because he was “scared of them.” What can a cat do really? They can scratch you I guess but no cat is that scary. I thought it was pretty funny that this guy that I could tell was a jerk turned out to be and not only that he was a wuss. This is really the only time I’ve heard of someone being afraid of cats so I hope it doesn’t damage my point too much.

You’re probably going to say “your cat only loves you for the food” but a lot of dogs love people because they feed the too. Just like dogs, cats may start loving you because of the food but they do love you for other reasons.

Hi there, if you liked Fantastic Beast and Where to Find Them (the new Harry Potter series) than I have a theory for you.

First I know that not many people read my blog and that some of you may not be fans of Harry Potter and may not know these terms so here is a dictionary:

1. The elder wand- one of the parts of the Deathly Hallows. It it the most powerful wand and was given to one of the brothers told in the Deathly Hallows story by death. The three parts to the deathly hallows are the resurrection stone (can bring back people from the dead, was taken by death from the river), the invisibility cloak (makes you invisible and hides the user from even death, was a piece of death’s cloak), and finally the elder wand (most powerful wand ever created, fashioned by death from a near by tree) if anyone person has all of these he (or she) has the power to control death.

2. Gellert Girndelwald- the villain in Fantastic Beast and Where to Find Them.

3. Azkaban- the prison that was made for wizards, first mentioned in the prisoner of Azkaban (the 3rd Harry Potter book). It’s basically the equivalent to Alcatraz (except it’s for wizards and witches and instead of water it’s protected by death eaters (they suck the life out of you and bring back your worst memories).

4. Ollivander- the name of the guy who owns Elevander’s and sells Harry Potter his first wand. He is well known in the wizarding world for being a wand expert (and in the 4th Harry Potter book he “weights the wands” to make sure they can be used in the tournament).

5. Dumbledore and you-know-who- honestly if you don’t know these terms you should be reading this but Dumbledore is head master and you-know-who is Voldemort aka Tom Riddle (he’s the villain just in case,but seriously stop reading this if you didn’t know those two terms).

6. The snitch- a golden ball that is part of a wizarding game called Quiditch (I hope I spelled that right). If the seeker (the one who has to catch the snitch to end the game) catches it they are awarded 100 points (this doesn’t always mean they won but it usually does-sometimes a team can be 110 points behind so catching it would still make them 10 points behind). It is a pretty cool game but back to the subject, Harry is the seeker(the catcher of the snitch) and he catches the snitch in his first game but he actually ends up catching it with his mouth (this comes in play in my second theory).

In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, you-know-who is searching for the elder wand. First, he visits Ollivader but doesn’t get much out of him. His second visit is to Azkaban where he interrogates Gellert Girndelwald and tries to take the wand from him, Gellert tells him he no longer has it but he knows where it is. This means that at some point Gellert Girndelwald gets the elder wand at some point. It also means that he eventually goes to Azkaban. I don’t know when they will explain how these events happened I just know they happened. If you don’t believe me you should rewatch Harry Potter and Deathly Hallows part 1, you can reread the book if you’d like but it would be easier just to rewatch the movie, ha ha.

This is another theory, that can’t be proven but I think most of you can agree. Dumbledore had the power to control death. Although he never signed his name when Harry received the cloak and only put “use it well” we can assume he was the one who gave it to Harry with common sense. We know he had the elder wand because Voldemort got it from his grave, and he had the resurrection stone because he gave it to Harry after he died. He must have put it in the snitch before Harry’s first game because it opens when he swallowed it, Dumbledore’s very intelligent but no one saw that coming. In the snitch was the resurrection stone which is revealed in the last movie/book. During the 1st book/movie and before Dumbledore had access to all three Hallows which means at some point he had the power to control death.

Now I have a question for all those Harry Potter fans who think they can answer this: Voldemort never knew that Harry was a horcrux (if you don’t know what this is you frankly can’t answer the question) but he knew that he could only split his soul and put it into a horcrux a curtain number of times (I think you can split your soul 7 times) . Wouldn’t he have noticed that he didn’t have the last piece of his soul. For example he has 3 pieces of his soul left-he puts one in Harry and has 2 remaining- when he gets down to his last one wouldn’t he think “oh shoot where is that last piece of my soul?” You can’t just loose your soul like that, it’s not like a key that you can’t find it’s your soul he knows he must have put it in something that he doesn’t know about, but wouldn’t he at least notice it’s missing?

Another question for anyone who thinks they can answer it: In Harry Potter, Goblet of fire Barty Crouch Jr. uses polyjuice potion to look like Mad Eye Moody, while looking like Mad Eye Moody he teaches the student of Hogwarts, Durmstrang, and Beauxbatons about the 3 Unforgivable curses (illegally by the way and because he thought it was right not because he was being forced to do so) why does he teach them about the unforgivable curses? He’s a death eater so it makes no sense for him to teach them something that could drastically help them fight you-know-who and other death eaters or followers.

This last paragraph has nothing to do with Harry Potter but for those of you who also love Princess Bride, this is for you. (I’ve already pointed this out to my parents but for others–not that there are many– this is new news.) In the fight scene between the giant and Wesley, the giant asks Wesley why he’s wearing a mas. He replies that it’s comfortable and he believes everyone in the future will be wearing them. I hope you see the joke, we are all wearing masks XD except our cover our masks and not the upper part of our face. (Here’s the link to the scene on YouTube in case you want to see for yourself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lISBP_fPg1s)

(Part 1) A Strange Question

I have a question, it seems silly at first but when you think about it it becomes very confusing. The question id: Is war about who is left or who is right?

I think it’s about who is right,  because there no reason to have war if both of you agree.  After all war only works if both teams thing they’re right. For example, two teams are having a war on if purple or grey cup cakes are best (I know this is a lame example…, because it’s obviously purple). Both sides think they’re right, and this causes a war. But if both agree purple are better (because they are), then there would be no war, but because both disagree they have a war.

But it wouldn’t be fair if I didn’t talk about the other side of this. I see why people think it could be about who is left because the way to settle the agreement is threw who is left. Going back to the example if the teams are even 5:5 and purple team has 3 people left while grey only has 2 then purple wins. Therefor because more of them were left they win the war. So maybe it would help if you asked yourself this: Would it still be called war if no one died?

leave you vote and argument in the comments and I will try to add some of your arguments in as well.

(Part 2) A New Idea

In summary, war is about killing each other to see who will surrender/give up or be left standing. But there has to be another way. I have two ideas for a new way to solve disagreements.

Way #1:  Testing a curtain way before trying it.

I think this would be the best way out of my two ideas. You test both ideas in a safe and cut of region. For example: (I used the same example in the topic above “a strange question”) Two teams want to know which it better purple or grey cupcakes. You have two  secluded regions with some test subjects. They live in these regions for a month, only able to eat one color cupcake. Then after a month they see which cupcake works best, based on votes living conditions, ect..I see many ways in which this idea could never work, but only an idea, and it’s not like it’ll ever be used, but it’s still fun to ponder in ways this could turn out. I see many ways in which this would never work (like if an idea works for the 3 years of testing but doesn’t last for 5 years). Tell me if you think this idea isn’t completely bad, I know it’s not perfect, but it’s not like it really matters, it’s just a fun idea.

     Way #2: AIR SOFT!

I love air soft, it’s soo fun, but what if it could be used to solve disagreements. It basically works the same way as real war but with air soft guns instead of real guns. If you get shot (in an area you’s potentially die) you go out, instead of dying) Maybe they could color the bullets to see where you get shot, you know in case some cheats. And basically you pretend to be shot instead of actually getting shot….

Okay,I admit this is kind of a joke, but who knows it could work.